Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Thursday, 20 August 2009

Japan bans Twitter during election campaign

For those of you who take a close interest in such things, here's how they're conducting elections in Japan, by cartoon. Perhaps I should be talking to some of Bristol's animators? (UWE runs one of the best, if not the best, animation courses in the country).

However, doesn't look like any of their parties will be appointing a Twitter tsar in the near future:

“But some modern electioneering tools are restricted. During the 12-day official campaign period, use of the internet - blogs, e-mail, websites, Twitter - is banned, preventing lawmakers from adopting the kind of youth-oriented campaigning that swept Barack Obama to power.”

Tuesday, 18 August 2009

In which I realise I'm stuck with Twitter tsar...

As people might imagine the past 24 hours or so have been pretty hectic, with lots of media and trying to keep up with people contacting me on Twitter about the new role. I have two problems doing the broadcast media - one is trying to remember my official job title - it's New Media Campaigns Spokesperson - and the second is trying desperately hard not to convert every word beginning with t into a tw. Very nearly said 'twelevision' on Radio Humberside earlier. Before we know everyone will be at it, and in years to come students of ancient English as she was spoke will spend many a twutorial discussing how the t- fell into disuse in all but the most neanderthal, Twitter-resistant parts of the country, like Witney. (Which I very nearly just called Twitney).

Anyway, because I've been speaking about it all day, in between doing the day job, I really don't have the energy to blog about it too. If you're interested have a read of the original LabourList 'launch' interview, and this, for a local news website, Bristol 24/7. And there's also this interview from a few weeks ago.

Tuesday, 11 August 2009

A politician's word is her bond...

I told House of Twits (or House of Tw*ts as it's no doubt known by Mr Cameron) that I liked his website and would link to it on my blog. But I didn't and now his wife thinks he's a loser.

So... a big shout out (as Mr Cameron would no doubt say) for House of Twits and his wonderful website, http://www.houseoftwits.co.uk/ which is a good way of catching up with all things political in the wonderful world of Twitter.

Ironically, one of the most recents tweets to appear on there is this from Michael of the Independent, publicising a new website trying to hold MPs to account over broken promises - http://tinyurl.com/ktgj9x. Seems to be to me an open invitation to the type of constituents whose letters almost inevitably end up referencing MI5, the freemasons or some other form of international conspiracy which has prevented them getting their fence fixed for the past twenty years. But we shall see.

Tuesday, 4 August 2009

Is Twitter a TWOT (Total Waste of Time?)

Someone - a young lad by the look of it - has tweeted me (and yes, I still feel silly saying that), complaining that MPs should be working instead of using Twitter and in my case suggesting that I should be fighting to lower the cost of public transport, as I have apparently never done so. He also said 'bus fares have gone up again, but at least we'll soon have a Tory government' (who would of course in their very first Budget introduce swingeing taxes on car ownership, bring in a nationwide congestion charge, and put it all into subsidising the buses).

I've suggested he looks at this blog and my website for ample evidence of what others might deem an unhealthy obsession with First Bus, and also tried to explain insofar as one can do so in a few tweets that (a) Tories deregulated the buses, (b) local Tories and Lib Dems across the four councils have been less than helpful in our efforts at joint working, e.g. on the need for a Strategic Transport Authority, or on the location of park and ride schemes, (c) the Conservatives in Parliament voted against the Local Transport Bill, which gives councils more powers to introduce Quality Bus Contracts - i.e. taking back control of the buses - as well as more support for STAs; (d) the Government has given £43 million for the Greater Bristol Bus Network, and (e) I'm spending most of tomorrow in Brislington, talking to local people about plans for the A4 Showcase Bus Route. I didn't mention the fact I'm currently in correspondence with the First Bus boss and indeed the First Group boss about fares, but that too... And yes, fares are still going up; I have influence, not control in such matters.

But apart from all that - and also leaving aside the fact that it is 11pm and one might think I'm entitled to some 'me time' - I wanted to just deal with the suggestion that MPs are wasting their time on Twitter. Yes - some of it is a bit silly (though fun). Some of it is about bonding with people who share a similar sense of humour or a similar political outlook. Some of it is about getting into arguments with political opponents, and there's a fair bit of political point-scoring. Sometimes it's about passing on information, publicising things, bringing them to wider attention.

But basically what Twitter comes down to, is this: It's about communicating. It's about engaging with people. It's a conversation, a dialogue, and anyone can join in. And don't we politicians get criticised all the time for not doing that? So far today I've exchanged tweets with people about the Family Intervention Project in Bristol and the Daily Express' hugely misleading frontpage story today (and Ed Balls has too). Yesterday I was tweeting with someone about the new rules on acquiring British citizenship. I've also been DM-ing someone about various Conference related stuff; someone I've never met, actually, but we exchange ideas on Twitter regularly. I've also been tweeting about the SATS results in Bristol; publicising the fact Mike Foster (DFID Minister) and Ed Miliband are now on Twitter; and, I confess, indulging in some rather silly banter about Michael Gove's bizarre comments about Spandau Ballet. (I spent much of today on hold, making various phone calls; it passes the time and takes your mind off the 'your call is important to us' messages).

And yes, I've also been into my constituency office today, although no actual appointments. Tomorrow I'll be at the annual Bristol Play Day (fingers crossed that the rain stops by then), then joining police and council officers for a walkabout in Broomhill, then visiting various shopowners who have raised concerns about the A4 Showcase Bus Route, then joining Councillor Simon Crew for a drop-in surgery in Brislington, and then going to Brislington Labour Party's branch meeting. And then I'll get back home, having been out and about for nearly ten hours, and if I decide I want to go on Twitter, I will!

Saturday, 27 June 2009

The power of Twitter

A few weeks ago the Daily Mail ran a story about how it was being suggested that travellers should be treated quickly by local NHS services if they need it, because, being travellers, they would be moving on to somewhere else pretty soon and thus might not ever get the treatment they needed.

The Mail, obviously expecting an outbreak of indignation amongst its readers, then started an online poll: 'Should gypsies be allowed to queue-jump in the NHS?' or something along those not-at-all-loaded lines, But word got out on Twitter, and before you know it the poll was showing a magnificent 96% in favour of the proposition. Before it was pulled.

Wednesday, 17 June 2009

#charitytuesday

Mini-blogs today. Interesting piece in yesterday's Guardian re #charitytuesday on Twitter (and #woofwednesday!) I think Twitter is, in a small way, proving to be a good forum for bringing together the politically active and the politically interested... and who knows, some of the latter might eventually be persuaded to get out of their armchairs too!

Saturday, 25 April 2009

Catch a wave

Been trying to find out through Twitter how TwitterFall works - something to do with all tweets on a specific hashtag appearing on screen. Anyway, my enquiries led Paul from Portishead to reply to me with this gem: what happened when the old fogeys at the Telegraph tried to get with it and show all tweets relating to Budget 2009 on their website. Maybe it should now rename itself the Twittergraph?

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

Damned if we do, damned it we don't!

Can't find it on Times website, but here's a summary of today's story re politicians and Twitter:

‘Politicians twitter while the country burns’ (Ti p25)- Sylvester doesn’t seem to be too impressed with politicians’ use of twitter from GB downwards. She says in this country, middle-aged MPs hope they will look youthful and “in touch” if they use the latest web tool. But there is a slight Dad-on-the-dancefloor feel to some of their attempts. The content is all too often less twitter than witter. Is the reputation of politics really enhanced by the revelation Knight is “snowed under with paperwork” or that Shapps is “contemplating taking my eldest son to play football in the rain” or that Harris “can't find the TV remote control”? Twitter is reality TV without the pictures. There is a combination of neurosis and narcissism involved. The psychologist Oliver James has said: “Twittering stems from a lack of identity. It's a constant update of who you are, what you are, where you are. Nobody would Twitter if they had a strong sense of identity.”

Sylvester thinks that at Westminster, it is a symbol of a wider loss of confidence by the political class. At the very moment when leadership is required to deal with the economic downturn, politicians of all parties are frozen in the headlights of the recession. The Govt is now the majority shareholder of several banks but seems to have no control over the bankers. The opposition parties are quick to criticise Labour's decisions but find it hard to say what they would do instead. The political elite has been neutered by the collective failure to predict and prevent the credit crunch and their apparent powerlessness to reverse it now. There are global new deals and there is Twitter - but what precisely is there in between?

Saturday, 7 March 2009

Care to comment?

thebristolblogger said...
another internet fad? I give your Twitter account a month before it goes the same way as the Facebook account ...
Sat Dec 13, 07:44:00 PM

Sunday, 11 January 2009

24 hour Twitter people (updated version)

OK, still only semi-Twitterate, even after my briefing from Sam at the Pervasive Media Studio on Friday, but things are happening...

On February 12th Bristol will be joining in what is billed as 'a global celebration of Twitter and its tweeters" - have a look at http://twitter.com/bristwestival and Bristol Twestival on Facebook for info. (I originally thought it was an anniversary celebration, but may have been misinformed, as someone else reckons the anniversary is in July). And I've now been told it's part of this, Twestival or here's the main Twestival website, which so far involves 47 cities and presumably lots of people.

It's for a good cause, charity:water, and it's a party, so what more do you need to persuade you? I assume some Twittering will be involved too... or is it Tweeting? Sam did tell me... He also explained what pervasive media was, but let's just say I'm not quite ready to answer questions on that yet. Sounds like they have fun though.

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Twittering

Guardian belatedly has an article on Twitter today, which echoes much of the celeb trivia in the Mail on Sunday's version, but throws in a bit about the Israeli government using it as a PR tool to give it a bit of intellectual credibility.
Those who get beyond the bits about Britney, John Cleese, Jonathan Ross and Stephen Fry in the Mail's version, will see that "Astonishingly one Labour politician even posted a message from inside the House of Commons Chamber. At 11.47am on December 15, Bristol East MP Kerry McCarthy sent a Twitter via her mobile saying: ‘In Chamber thinking I’m not going to get called and won’t have long enough to say anything meaningful if I am.’"
Most 'astonishing' perhaps is that December 15 was a Monday, and the House doesn't sit till 2.30pm. But I've just checked and the message was actually sent at 7.47pm, after I'd been sitting there for more than five hours. Which shows admirable restraint on my part, I think.
Still not sure I quite see the point of twittering, but will persevere.

Tuesday, 23 December 2008

Tony Benn Twitters! (Or do I mean Tweets!)

It took me a while to work out what was going on here. Thankfully I followed the link before I started babbling on about how impressed I was by his superior grasp of technology.

The Telegraph
has a feature on Twitter today (well, Monday), which goes a little way towards explaining the why, if not the how. Useful in earthquakes, apparently. It strikes me it would be useful at Party Conference when people are trying to arrange meet-ups, or to let people know what reception they've popped into. Although at conference there is always someone you're desperately trying to avoid who keeps turning up in the same place as you, and they'd be bound to be the sort that would be following absolutely everyone's tweets. (Is that the correct term? Using it feels a bit stupid).

Saturday, 6 December 2008

Twittering

I am trying to get my head round this Twitter thing and quite what the point is. Number 10 say they have 7,169 'following' it and 6448 'followers'... no idea what the difference is. Is it useful? Should I be doing it?
Were I to be Twittering at this precise moment, I would probably be saying 'My God isn't Paul Weller spectacularly boring'? But I don't suppose anyone wants to be woken up by a text message telling them that.